Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / United Nations of religion already feuding?

United Nations of religion already feuding?

July 1, 1998 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

The United Religions Initiative (URI) gained controversy and publicity in recent years for its attempt to create a sort of United Nations of religions, but the organization is already showing signs of division.

The evangelical anti-cultist SCP Journal (Vol. 21:4-22:1) takes a critical look at the organization, noting that it has undergone a number of changes since it was started two years ago by Episcopal Bishop William Swing of San Francisco. Swing conceived of the URI as the religious counterpart of the United Nations, as it would draw together the world’s “great faiths” to deliberate and act together  on common issues.

But as Swing passed his vision on to other religious leaders and activists, the focus on traditional religions began to change.  By 1997 Swing himself dropped the “religious” requirement for URI, as it was decided that groups claiming a  “spiritual” identity as well should be included. Leaders from New Age (Barbara Marx Hubbard) and other alternative movements, such as Neopaganism, soon joined the group.

At the same time, a more pragmatic, secular dimension has also emerged in URI. A team from the Social Innovations in Global Management at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland  has been instrumental in the organization’s development. They, and other secular supporters of the URI (such as the Gorbachev and Soros foundations), see the group, and religion in general, as a tool for promoting the notion of the “global good.” For the URI to become a major interfaith forum, it  will have to include more traditional-conservative religionists, such as the Catholics (although individual Catholic leaders have signed on) and evangelicals.

This goal may difficult to achieve, since many of the more recent alternative-New Age groups have called for the exclusion of Christian “fundamentalism” from the URI platform — a change from Swing’s more tolerant position that the initiative should “leave the porch light on for everyone.”

(SCP Journal, Box 4308, Berkeley, CA 94704)

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • On/File: July/August 1998
  • Findings & Footnotes: July/August 1998
  • Celtic spirituality finding congregational shape
  • Unificationist blessing movement catches on in Africa
  • Current Research: July/August 1998
  • Anti-cult movement broadens agenda, clientele
  • Hinduism’s ‘digital dharma’
  • Spiritual seekers return to India
  • Faith-filled books for parents embrace the religious spectrum
  • Popcorn: lifestyles changes challenge religion
  • Promise keepers face a new downturn this summer
  • The new ‘moral majority’ — golden rule Christians?

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress