Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Court decision signals return of strict church-state separation

Court decision signals return of strict church-state separation

July 1, 2000 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

In one of its most far-reaching decisions on church-state relations in over a decade, the Supreme Court’s decision to disallow the student-led prayers before football games is being interpreted as a major victory for holding to strict separationism.

For several years, the “accomodationist” position of allowing more cooperation between organized religion and the state seemed to be gaining ground in high court rulings. But the Texas decision, as understood by both its supporters and its critics, is clearly a return to the strict separationism of the l970s concerning school prayers and biblical readings.

Across the nation, the leading media interpreters such as the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, as reported on Christianityonline.com pointed out the timing of the decision was a reaffirmation of the more traditional position that prayers should be the personal choice of individuals, removed from multi-religious audiences, and freed of any suggestion of coercion of non-participants. On the other hand, conservative media commentators argued with Chief Justice William Rehnquist that the decision “bristles with hostility to all things religious in public life.”

Gary Bauer of the Family Research Council argued that the decision “proves a majority of the court is at war with the religious tradition of America.” The American Center for Law and Justice called the decision “censorship.” The Freedom Forum offered the conclusion that church/state relations in 2000 are now back to where they had been at least forty years ago. All commentators agreed the Court would not likely take up another case of this far-reaching magnitude in the near future.

(www.christianityonline.com/ct/2000/125.O.html)

— By RW contributing editor Erling Jorstad

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • On/File: July/August 2000
  • Findings & Footnotes: July/August 2000
  • Pakistan exports militant Islam through schools
  • Evangelical-Catholics team up for outreach in France
  • Current Research: July/August 2000
  • Far right religions gravitating to Ozarks
  • Any prayer beads will do for generic spirituality?
  • Yogic battle between traditionalist and newcomers?
  • Future science-religion dialogue less Western, de-Christianized?
  • Bush campaign takes on Catholic edge
  • Bible courses center of new church-state rifts

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress