Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Intelligent design and creationism coexisting, quarreling

Intelligent design and creationism coexisting, quarreling

September 1, 2002 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

Thanks to the “intelligent design” movement, the distance between evangelical Christians holding to a belief in some form of evolution and those opposed to the theory has narrowed, though not without tension and divisions.

The Christian Research Journal (Volume 24 Number 4) reports that the emergence of the intelligent design movement has helped  create a “big tent” approach among evangelicals in attacking Darwinian theories and teachings that deny God’s existence. In the past those holding to a belief in creationism, which teaches that the earth was created in seven literal days, allowed no room for evolution .Intelligent design necessitates that the earth has a creator but makes wide allowance for how the creation took place.

Paul Nelson, a creationist himself, writes that some traditional creationists remain unhappy with the intelligent design movement. The inclusion of “progressive creationists” (those holding that God created the world in a longer than seven day time span) and theistic evolutionists (that God was somehow involved in evolution) in the anti-Darwinist camp muddies the water, as  pantheist, and New Age views also can be supported by these theories, according to veteran creationist leader Henry Morris.

Nelson adds that there may be a class factor in the conflict. “Over the past decade, the demographics of dissent from neo-Darwinian evolution have changed dramatically. In some discussions on university campuses or Internet listservers, traditional creationists now find themselves the distinct minority among skeptics of neo-Darwinism.

Although they have grown accustomed to scorn from evolutionary scientists, traditional creationists may be unhappy to discover that their own allies (other anti-Darinians) regard them as poor cousins visiting from the trailer park…” Nelson holds that the big-tent approach best allows all kinds of anti-Darwinists to influence secular culture.

(Christian Research Journal, P.O. Box 7000, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-7000)

 

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • Islamists moving back to government in Turkey?
  • On/File: September 2002
  • Findings & Footnotes: September 2002
  • Evangelical missions toward muslims expand
  • The Anglo-Catholic moment in British society
  • Difficult times ahead for world council of churches
  • Current Research: September 2002
  • Just war teachings challenged by Catholic activists
  • New vocations growing among single mothers
  • Packed Buddhist festivals, empty temples in Hawaii
  • Alternatives to collection plates find favor
  • Exodus movement from public schools get more clout
  • Hip-hop churches taking root
  • Catholic reform movement faces obstacles
  • Chinese house church supporters face heterodox movement

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2020 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress