Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Seeking alternatives to the megachurch-state clash

Seeking alternatives to the megachurch-state clash

July 1, 2007 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

Churches and municipalities are clashing over land use issues, particularly due to the growth of megachurches, causing both local governments and congregations to look beyond the usual route of enforcing free exercise of religion legislation.

World magazine (June 9) reports that clashes between politicians and churches over land use and resulting loss of tax revenue are becoming common. Federal legislation, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), gives churches the leverage to sue cities that attempt to block them from purchasing huge parcels of land for their use.

Thus, as the number of megachurches grow, so too does the number of lawsuits. But this law has also pushed cities to “automatically view large churches as pushy neighbors and unstoppable drains on public resources,” writes Mark Bergin. In some places, local governments have made attempts at rolling back tax exemption or even approaching congregations and other voluntary organizations asking for voluntary donations.

But new approaches to this issue have also come from the congregations. The Soma Church in Tacoma, Wash, does not own its own building but leases it at a highly discounted rate from Pastor Jeff Vanderstelt, who started a for-profit corporation independent of the church and financed by friendly investors. Not only does this approach address the issue of large churches draining public resources, but because Vandestelt’s building provides space for other businesses, it integrates the church and its members into the broader community. Bergin reports that Vanderstelt’s approach is being considered by other megachurch planters.

(World, P.O. Box 20002, Asheville, NC 28802)

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • On/File: July 2007
  • Findings & Footnotes: July 2007
  • Confucianism vs. religious freedom in China?
  • Islamic modernization gaining ground?
  • Orthodoz support of hardline Russian foreign policy?
  • French-speaking Europe and cults: An update
  • Current Research: July 2007
  • Southern Baptists drifting toward center on politics?
  • Unitarian-Universalist Buddhism — made in America?

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress