Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / ‘Business as mission’ as the new frontier of evangelization

‘Business as mission’ as the new frontier of evangelization

December 1, 2007 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

Missions and business are forming an alliance as Christian-based companies around the world are seeking to play a new role in evangelization. Christianity Today (November) reports that the phenomenon has gone by different names–from Business as Mission (BAM) to marketplace missions–but such mixing of businesses with Christian proclamation is seen as the “next great wave of evangelization.” BAM practitioners use their business ventures not only to make money but to spread the Christian gospel and plant churches. In this way, BAM is different than the movement of companies seeking to integrate spiritual or religious values into the workplace. The BAM model holds that business is a Christian calling, but are “piggybacking on a broader trend known as `social entrepreneurship,’ which advocates using capitalism instead of using charity to address social problems like poverty,” writes Joe Maxwell.

The movement is led by “kingdom professionals” who see themselves as having access to nations and peoples that are denied to traditional missionaries. There are three kinds of BAM firms: small companies (often called micro enterprises) usually started by small loans, such as a small jewelry-making business in Thailand consisting of ex-sex workers; larger capital-based companies use their resources to engage in international outreach and gain favor with local and national governments. One example of this kind of company is AMI, an Asian technology manufacturer. Finally, outsourcing companies target particular groups, such as disabled people in India, paying for their training. The major drawback to BAM is that these companies’ freestanding nature, makes them unaccountable to any mission agency or denomination. In some cases, “hybrid” efforts are underway, where a church or mission, such as the Presbyterian Church in America‘s Peru Mission, will cooperate with BAM, planting churches as well as developing business enterprises.

(Christianity Today, 465 Gundersen Dr., Carol Stream, IL 60188)

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • Findings & Footnotes: December 2007
  • South African churches seen as playing new role
  • Islam in Germany faces pressure to organize
  • Mother Teresa’s order thriving 10 years after her death
  • New apostolic church feels winds of change
  • Current Research: December 2007
  • Christian reconstructionism — declining and rising?
  • Romney’s evangelical strategy weakening Mormon base?
  • Liberation theology’s secular reincarnation?

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2020 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress