Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Academic rivalry, popularization challengebiblical archeology

Academic rivalry, popularization challengebiblical archeology

July 1, 2012 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

A mixture of academic rivalry, journalistic sensationalism and religious concerns is changing the field of biblical archeology, reports the Chronicle Review (June 22).

For decades, biblical archeology has been driven by debates over discoveries in the Holy Land, but more recently the field has been split by “maximalist” and “minimalist” camps. The maximalists tend to see the biblical account as a reference helping to explain recent finds, such as the recent unearthing of shrines and other cultic objects that are said by proponents to show that biblical references to King David have some basis in history. The minimalists charge that the “traditional” account is marked by religious and nationalist (Israeli) bias, as they argue that such biblical figures as David, Solomon, Moses and Abraham are mythical figures, throwing doubt on the existence of a historic land of Israel.

Even beyond this debate is the turmoil surrounding and challenges to the credibility of biblical archeology created by a wave of mass media interest in the latest archeological finds. Docudramas and movies on spectacular biblical discoveries, often funded by moguls such as director James Cameron and aired on cable channels like Discovery, have created a new market for “holy relics” that often sidesteps credible scholarship, writes Matthew Kalman.

One of the most well-known practitioners of the popularized biblical archeology is Simcha Jacobovici, who has claimed such controversial discoveries as unearthing Jesus’s tomb and, more recently, finding the nails used in his crucifixion. Critics have sought to challenge such media claims of momentous discoveries, but find few opportunities for intellectual exchange. Jacobovici and other commentators charge that their scholarly critics are ordained ministers and have a religious agenda in delegitimizing “Jesus scholarship.”

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • On/File: July/August 2013
  • Findings & Footnotes: July/August 2013
  • Singapore shows church–society tensions, but not culture wars
  • Western monks in Thailand preserving traditional Buddhist discipline
  • Japan’s Happy Science reaching Africa
  • Corruption charges in Korea’s largest church show megachurch turmoil, rethinking
  • Changing face of Reformed clergy in Switzerland
  • Foreign-trained preachers challenge local Islam in Albania
  • Iranian immigrants in Germany showing high Christian conversion rates
  • German circumcision controversy ignites debate across Europe
  • Current Research: July/August 2013
  • Canada’s immigrant clergy move outof ethnic enclaves
  • Secularist/skeptical movement facesgender imbalance and harassment charges
  • Pre-Vatican II church architecture revives
  • DNA tests uncovering Jewish ancestryin Catholic populations
  • Jews rethinking where to draw the lineson Christian support for Israel
  • Growing acceptance of black Jewsby Jewish mainstream
  • Vitality and pluralism lead trendsin world Judaism
  • Reform rabbis more willing to officiate at interfaith weddings

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress