Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Representing or monopolizing Poland’s Jewish community?

Representing or monopolizing Poland’s Jewish community?

March 18, 2013 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

There is increasing division between Orthodox and progressive Jews in Poland over the matter of who will represent the Jewish community in the country, according to the Jerusalem Report (February 25).

The magazine reports that there is an “internecine battle for power and prestige—and the vast control of funds” between the Polish Orthodox community represented by Twarda (named for the street the organization is located on in Warsaw) and Beit Polska of the progressive Jewish community, writes Nissan Tzur. In 2008 Beit Polska requested and received from the Polish Interior Ministry recognition as the umbrella organization of progressive Jews. In response, the Union of Jewish Religious Communities, which was until then the only Jewish community recognized by the Polish government, appealed to have the decision overturned, claiming that by law it had the monopoly as the umbrella organization for all Jewish groups in Poland.

Twarda claimed that the union also represented the progressive stream of Judaism and demanded to be a part of the Beit Polska’s registration. For its part, Beit Polska and its founder Severyn Ashkenazy charge that Twarda’s leaders are concerned about having to share the government subsidies it receives with the progressive community. Ashkenazy adds that the Orthodox community has been selling off assets from abandoned Jewish properties that have been transferred to the Jewish community by the government and there is little transparency about where this money has gone.

To complicate the situation even more, Twarda recently formed a new progressive congregation to show that both streams of Judaism can coexist. Beit Polska claims that the move is merely a façade and that the real issue is Twarda’s opposition to Jewish pluralism and its desire to maintain its monopoly. There have been attempts to settle the dispute by outside Jewish leaders, but little progress has been made.

(Jerusalem Report, http://thejerusalemreport.wordpress.com/)

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • Virtual classrooms gain ground among American seminaries, with evangelicals leading the way
  • A pope of the new evangelization
  • On/File: March/April 2013
  • Findings & Footnotes: March/April 2013
  • ‘Off the books’ secularization in Israel?
  • Poland: still a high level of religious practice, but shows a more affirmative secular camp
  • Religion and values still related in Europe
  • Secularization and culture wars gain currency in Latin America
  • Current Research: March/April 2013
  • Straight Edge punks adopt ascetic,non-institutional spirituality
  • Christians borrow bar mitzvahs as new rite-of-passage
  • Orthodox outreach creating new bridge between American Judaism’s conflicting camps?
  • Evangelicals recycle mainline churches while keeping their ‘authenticity’
  • Cable television cashing in on religion and its controversies

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress