Religion Watch Archives

Monitoring Trends in Religion - From February 1990 to January 2016

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • By Issue
    • By Article
    • By PDF (2008-14)
    • By PDF (1985-97)
    • All Articles
  • Sections
    • Current Research
    • Findings & Footnotes
    • On/File
  • Google Search
You are here: Home / Archive / Mainline support for non-traditional families weak?

Mainline support for non-traditional families weak?

March 1, 2001 by Richard Cimino

Print-friendly

Although mainline Protestants have emphasized inclusiveness and have criticized traditional family initiatives, their churches have attracted fewer non-traditional families than evangelicals who espouse more conservative family views, writes W. Bradford Wilcox in the Christian Century (Feb. 21).

Wilcox looks at the articles, sermons and programs of mainline churches and finds that they may speak of the plight of children in social injustice and poverty, but they have offered little in the way of concrete support and advice on family matters. The paradox is seen in a mainline periodical such as Christian Century. Between 1980 and 1995, 32 percent of the articles in the magazine dealt with social justice issues while only five percent concerned family- and sex-related topics. Surveys of mainline clergy and laity has shown high tolerance of changes in the family (divorce, remarriage, and same-sex couples), but have not addressed moral concerns about the effect of divorce on children.

This tolerance of new family patterns combined with a distaste for the “family values”  approach of evangelicals have tended to make mainline churches shy away from offering any clear guidance on family issues. Wilcox cites the National Congregational Survey as showing that conservative Protestant churches are more than twice as likely to offer nontraditional family ministries, such as support groups for divorced and single adults, than mainline churches. “Even more ironic is that mainline congregations actually have slightly more formal programs for conventional families” — such as marriage programs — than do conservative Protestant churches, writes Wilcox.

Also surprisingly, mainline churches were less likely to attract members from non-traditional families than were conservative churches. Wicox concludes that mainline churches are still tied to the conventional family pattern despite their tolerant rhetoric and views. To cope with the future such churches need to develop more programs to deal with non-traditional families while also addressing the “mounting evidence that divorce and out-of-wedlock childbearing pose serious threats to children.”

(Christian Century, 407 S. Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60605)

 

Print-friendly

Filed Under: Archive

Also in this issue

  • On/File: March 2001
  • Findings & Footnotes: March 2001
  • Hindu-based schools flourish in India with help from nationalists
  • Liberation theologians warm to charismatic renewal in Brazil
  • Conservatives driving new church growth in the Netherlands
  • Current Research: March 2001
  • Christian internet companies face dot-com bust
  • Moderate factor encouraged in new cardinal appointments?
  • Psychotherapy finding home in Buddhist spiritual direction
  • Ex-Catholics women showing influence in Protestant pulpits
  • Faith-based social service hits snag on alternative religions
  • Young Catholics — Relativist and committed?

Search the Site

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Download the first issue of RELIGION WATCH (1980)

Click on the image for downloading

© 2016-2023 Richard Cimino / Religioscope
·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress